Moondrop Nice Buds review

Feb. 14, 2026 Notable
image of nicehck
(OSP: £14) £10
Aliexpress/Moondrop

Throughwork

Moondrop emerged in 2015 with expensive, frequency‐precise earphones then moved in cheap on similar markets. The company started with and has retained an interest in eaarbuds—these are their cheapest.

Contents

image of nicehck-traceless

Build

Coherent, cheap assembly. Average tangle resistance with soft cable. A simple stamp for the join. The wire looks cheap, a thin two‐core eight below the join. Plug is a straight steel jack. No strain relief system. The housings are smoke‐plastic and slimmer than the older stock items used elsewhere. The earphones are big, flat in shape, with the stems a little offset, come ready‐fitted with foams—they may not fit smaller ears, and one size only. If the buds fit in the ears they will likely hold, though not convincing. L/R identified by the offset stems, works for me, no marks. Nothing unexpected in the materials, plastic all the way. I’d expect these to be robust because there’s little to them and they’re constructed as a whole. The comfort seems better than the unyielding shape suggests, maybe due to secure foams—they need a wiggle to fit. I’m mixed about the looks—they’re coherent and have a concept, but look cheap in places, so I’d call them as median.

Sound

Fit to ear considered, overall volume is good, average range. Timing is controlled but feels lazy—dull attack—shows on mid strings especially. Swells are handled with a slight dulling and stumble but remain articulate. Low string sounds have the common mush, mid strings do not hold out enough and a slight spit and squawk to high brass. Some echo and distance, frequency range seems average but, modestly, they go lower than you might expect. There’s some detail, seems dulled by muddle, yet never papery. Colour is lacking throughout. especially in woodwinds, and high electric guitar can sound plastic. Scale is not wide but positioning, a little fuzzy, is stable.

Voice replay is controlled though unflattering. Salvages a remarkable amount of source from orchestral music, and can summon soundtracks with some scope. Cool but precise for minimal instrumentation. The tizz distracts and distance/slow attack don’t handle rock music, though instruments are clear. Same for pop, though some/many may prefer more colour and exaggeration—they like very processed high‐quality sources. Moondrop Nice Buds replay less edgy on cheaper phone/computer amps and lazier sources. I’ve had my say here, but the comments are absolute, these earphones are basically better replay than anything in this or similar brackets.

Spec

mic available? no
cable noise quiet
accessories None
support

Assess

Moondrop started with buds and, unlike others, have never given up. As long as Moondrop love buds, it makes sense to have a cheap entry, though these are priced so low they could replace the giveaways with cameras. The build is good enough and has some aesthetic appeal. Detail muddling, tinniness and distance make for grey sound, but they can retrieve voices and detail from sources—impressive especially on full‐range sound.

These contain a large 15.4mm dynamic driver, and Moondrop makes several claims for vents and airflow. I suspect a cheap driver makes for the muddle, and airflow frequency control slows the attack. Despite the Moondrop name, there is sum of zero serious reviews on these earphones. Earbuds are not useful for many, the Moondrop Nice Buds are too cheap to show the spectacular and comfortable replay buds can provide, I wonder at the large size and flat fit but, but… grey replay accepted, these are more detailed and controlled than anything remotely near.